350 at the Sydney Opera House, Australia, originally uploaded by 350.org.
350 at the Sydney Opera House, Australia, originally uploaded by 350.org.
While the term “racist” is a little too loosely thrown about, Ariel Salleh, a sociologist from the University of Sydney, makes the case for a far more radical sustainability discussion to the one that dominates the mass media right now. Click the link to stream the audio from Radio National.
The opposition seems to think that we need an emissions trading scheme that keeps big business happy. Funny, I thought the idea of an emissions trading scheme was to SAVE THE PLANET.
MALCOLM Turnbull is likely to get business backing for his emissions trading amendments, which the Coalition is drafting in close consultation with industry groups and major companies.
The Coalition’s strategy to gain business endorsement is likely to shatter the green-industry alliance that had supported the Rudd government scheme, with key conservation organisations vowing to abandon their support for the ETS if the government accepts the business-backed amendments.

Eddie Mabo occupies a large place in the history of relations between indigenous and other Australians. He played that role because he was a man of exceptional capacity and tenacity and also because he was part of the minority of indigenous Australians whose original home was in the islands of the Torres Strait.
The Torres Strait and the adjacent lands of Australia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea, and the people who live there, share many things, including exceptional vulnerability to climate change.
continued here.
Flyover of West Atlas oil spill

The good:
The bad:
There has been a dreadful sense of deja vu this last fortnight as Australia’s lone Family First senator (and local village idiot) jets back and forth the planet on a one man mission to uncover the truth about global warming.
It would be gut-achingly funny if it wasn’t so heart-breakingly serious.
Here are some recent quotes from our man Steve:
It is absolutely crazy for Australia to go it alone.
Sheesh! There is absolutely no risk that Australia, the world’s largest per capita polluter, will step forward alone! Much of the developed world is already streets ahead and are tracking downwards with respect to emissions.
We need to see what the rest of the world are going to do, and then Australia can respond.
You selfish, petty, miserable man. He is suggesting here that Australia, with one of the highest standards of living in the world, should wait for poorer countries to act first. Progress is never made in this way. The only way to convince others to join the party is to act quickly and boldly.
I’m not a climate change sceptic, I’m not a climate change extremist, what I am is very open minded.
A bit too open minded Steve. Becoming fixated on the minority views of partisan bit-players rather the great weight of scientists internationally. Your open-mindedness causes policy paralysis and endangers us all. Like the open-minded parent of a child with suspected meningitis. Sure, let’s not act until we’re %100 certain.
As an engineer, I have been trained to listen to both sides of the debate in order to make an informed decision about any issue. Any scientist worth their salt will tell you that in order to form a conclusive view about any topic, you need to properly explore all available possibilities.
C’mon mate. You’re sounding as if you’re the first one to tackle these questions. Scientists have been looking at these things for decades Steve. The problem is not that we haven’t debated all the issues, the problem is that THIS IS ALL WE HAVE DONE!
Has the Minister seen modelling which shows that solar radiation is highly correlated to global temperature changes?
Steve, there is no upward trend in solar radiation in the last few decades. Moreover nights are getting warmer faster than days, and winters faster than summers. This is not consistent with solar radiation causing global warming. IT’S NOT THE SUN, DUDE ! IT’S US !
None of this means that I support the current Emissions Trading Scheme legislation before the Australian Parliament. I tend to sympathise with the Greens on this issue. I feel that it is more important that we take a target of 40% below 1990 by 2020 to Copenhagen, and we need to state that up front.
Oh Steve, what shall we do with you?
Use soft words and hard arguments